"how is trivializing black lives matter movement a big difference from trivializing issues black people have?"
i did not say they were "trivializing" blm, you did and i disagreed with that. i said they were angry with blm for disrupting bernie's event. if you disrupt somebodys event some people will be mad at you and that should be obvious. that doesn't make everyone racist. btw not only is bernie their best possible ally, he's far enough left that he literally cannot win the presidency, which makes targeting him funny imo. and i don't really know why they n eed to "demand answers" from him when he has a perfect record on civil rights going back decades.
they were literally screaming in his face and shit lol. and some campaign staffer or something was like "we will let you speak, after bernie" and they were like "no" and kept screaming to let them talk now, even though, really, rushing the stage of an event with 30k people and being told "yes you can speak to this audience when we're done" seems like itd be pretty win. then the campaign relented and let them speak first and they still shut the rally down. so, why is it not okay to be critical of them? i agree with them that cops are racist pigs, but does that mean anything protesters do is always the best way to do things no matter how they go about it? that theyre incapable of doing dumb stuff? of course not
lastly my point is that bernie sanders could be saying "socialism ftw, check out this platform" and some activist can be like "actually we need lower taxes, and also black lives matter." and identity politics liberal fucktards would look at the two and be like "hmmmmmm, gotta support the activist here. bernie isnt sufficiently strong on race." even though if they read through any of his history theyd see hes put out plenty on race. it's just dumb. a trans person or black person or something can say something completely irrational or outright wrong and have people back them just because of identity.
