it's not my job to keep you up to par. something tells me you'll find it anyway. you're dedicated.
p.s. i covered it twice
I looked and I did not find it. I was courteous enough to link you to one of my previous posts to clarify an issue, if you are participating in this discussion in good faith it should not be a problem to do the same. Especially if you are sure you said this, it should be fairly simple to find the post and link me to it, or to at least quote the relevant portion, as I have done for you.
it's not my job to keep you up to par. something tells me you'll find it anyway. you're dedicated.
p.s. i covered it twice
I looked and I did not find it. I was courteous enough to link you to one of my previous posts to clarify an issue, if you are participating in this discussion in good faith it should not be a problem to do the same. Especially if you are sure you said this, it should be fairly simple to find the post and link me to it, or to at least quote the relevant portion, as I have done for you.
We've posted for like 4 pages, and some of them are rather long posts. You can search anytime you want. However, I'll paraphrase - basically I stated that there are many individuals who have poor working conditions, and that these are the exceptions to the rule / and I am not taking such into account with my argument as it's not measurable. I think I even at one point mentioned the air conditioning example like you did? maybe not, but I was definitely thinking it.
