Author Topic: Lame moderation by blid  (Read 29237 times)

Offline Nox

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 4133
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2015, 05:52:38 PM »
Maybe a good day when Dr.Marc Bergevin gonna tell me im depress because of my 6kdebt to the hells angels and because illuminati take my body and my soul on warcraft II i will really kill myself.
Mr.120apm aka U8! Best player of the world losing 4v3 against Phillip5256.

Offline Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart)

  • "The Architect"
  • Global Moderator
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2015, 05:57:07 PM »
Quote
you told someone to kill themselves.  I don't care any further than that.
so are you admitting right now that "kill yourself" should be and WILL be instant +20% warn from now on?
There's already rules about flaming etc.  If you don't know how to navigate that, you'll have to deal with the uncertainty. :)
    

Offline I hate naggers

  • Ogre Mage
  • ********
  • Posts: 2345
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2015, 06:01:04 PM »
yes there is.

Insulting should cause muting
    3 (2.4%)
Insulting should cause nothing
    7 (5.6%)

Offensive language should cause muting
    3 (2.4%)
Offensive language should cause nothing
    8 (6.3%)


plus:

As of right now the official rules poll disallows "spam, obnoxious pictures, offtopic garbage"; "acts of religious, racial, sexual intolerance", and posting "porno links, pictures, videos onpage". My interpretation of this:

how is any of this related to my post?

Offline Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart)

  • "The Architect"
  • Global Moderator
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2015, 06:05:06 PM »
well, did i end up splitting the thread?  hm!

anyway, i totally reject what you're angling for.  we do not need a new rule for this.  every mod ruling is not setting a new permanent precedent.  we do not need rules on top of rules, rules for each new circumstance as it occurs, we do not need to project this current ruling onto other future circumstances it may overlap with but not completely match, we do not need more and more delineation and categorization into finer and finer units the tenets of acceptable behavior or the resulting punishments, we do not need CLAW digging and sifting and poring through and over our rules for loopholes, for exploits, for permission to urge people toward suicide, for special "depression" exemptions, so that we can all work for CLAW, to satisfy CLAW, that our rules are completely and entirely and unrealistically "objective" so as to meet his ever probing, always exacting, completely ridiculous standards.  because this is life.  this is how life works.
    

Offline Nox

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 4133
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #19 on: March 11, 2015, 06:10:20 PM »
Wich rules? There no rules? I get ban 3 times from lies.

Your guys are just doing what you want when you want.
Mr.120apm aka U8! Best player of the world losing 4v3 against Phillip5256.

Offline I hate naggers

  • Ogre Mage
  • ********
  • Posts: 2345
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #20 on: March 11, 2015, 06:11:55 PM »
b-but.... but CLAW...


Offline EviL~Ryu

  • (ง︡'-'︠)ง "Bitchin!" ®©℗™
  • Dragon
  • **********
  • Posts: 6059
  • "It's going to be Legen-(wait for it......)-DARY!"
    • View Profile
    • Clan EviL Official Page
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #21 on: March 11, 2015, 06:46:05 PM »
b-but.... but CLAW...



U one ugly chick [emoji37]

Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X


-Administrator of Clan EviL
-Developer (Trivia Development and Analytics)

Offline Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart)

  • "The Architect"
  • Global Moderator
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #22 on: March 11, 2015, 06:48:45 PM »
Anna Torv is ok.  Fauxlivia is better looking than Olivia.
    

Offline EviL~Ryu

  • (ง︡'-'︠)ง "Bitchin!" ®©℗™
  • Dragon
  • **********
  • Posts: 6059
  • "It's going to be Legen-(wait for it......)-DARY!"
    • View Profile
    • Clan EviL Official Page
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #23 on: March 11, 2015, 06:53:50 PM »
Anna Torv is ok.  Fauxlivia is better looking than Olivia.
What show is this?

Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X


-Administrator of Clan EviL
-Developer (Trivia Development and Analytics)

Offline Nox

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 4133
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #24 on: March 11, 2015, 07:17:40 PM »
Hey blid dont flames, we dont cares about your show, move this to the public garbage, thank you.


r
o
f
l
Mr.120apm aka U8! Best player of the world losing 4v3 against Phillip5256.

Offline Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart)

  • "The Architect"
  • Global Moderator
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #25 on: March 11, 2015, 10:52:14 PM »
Anna Torv is ok.  Fauxlivia is better looking than Olivia.
What show is this?

Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X


Fringe
Kinda x-files type show
    

Offline Nox

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 4133
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #26 on: March 11, 2015, 10:53:03 PM »
Anna Torv is ok.  Fauxlivia is better looking than Olivia.
What show is this?

Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X


Fringe
Kinda x-files type show

I hope you see how it's hard to always stay on the initial topic.

It just make no sens, be realist.
Mr.120apm aka U8! Best player of the world losing 4v3 against Phillip5256.

Offline Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart)

  • "The Architect"
  • Global Moderator
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2015, 12:30:29 AM »
I don't actually care when things go off-topic.  What I don't like is when a flame war breaks out in the middle of a topic, and some people may still want to talk about the original item up for discussion.  Also, I'm happy to leave the Fringe talk in this thread for now because it doesn't matter, but if Claw came back and started talking more about my moderation, and then other people kept talking about Fringe, I would definitely split it at that point.
    

Offline Nox

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 4133
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #28 on: March 12, 2015, 12:53:25 AM »
Your more offtopic then i am.

Me and winchester was talking about me and him.

If the initial subject is me, i dont know how the fuck im offtopic in my own thread and my own myself.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2015, 04:35:11 AM by Equinox »
Mr.120apm aka U8! Best player of the world losing 4v3 against Phillip5256.

Offline I hate naggers

  • Ogre Mage
  • ********
  • Posts: 2345
    • View Profile
Re: Lame moderation by blid
« Reply #29 on: March 12, 2015, 04:34:36 AM »
welp, your logic is ultra inaccurate, you cant be a successful lawyer. There's ZERO rules about the flame, z e r o. What we have is a general consensus that posts including nothing but flame/spam/offtopic should be removed, thats it. My post was neither and you should be ashamed of yourself now that eq is spamming the entire boards with war2client blabbering yet i got warned for a truthful post.

a general rule about flaming is nothing of the sort youre trying to present:
Quote
every mod ruling is not setting a new permanent precedent.  we do not need rules on top of rules, rules for each new circumstance as it occurs, we do not need to project this current ruling onto other future circumstances it may overlap with but not completely match, we do not need more and more delineation and categorization into finer and finer units the tenets of acceptable behavior or the resulting punishments

seems like an overreaction for creating a simple rule such as "certain flaming will be punished depending on the mood/taste of the moderator"