Sepi, your logic is flawed. Giving swift a 1 star review to balance out 75 five star reviews to an average of 3 is just horrible math. Plus, everyone will see an unauthentic business review (that they believe is real) that could deter hundreds or thousands of clients from swift's business; social media is a powerful tool. What if Kyle's business was very professional and deserved all 5 star reviews?
Swift saying "you suck" in game is worth 50,000 in business revenue? Pshh. (arbitrary number, IDK the size of swift's company, but everything is important). I have partnerships with 82 universities in the U.S. that send me service-learning students each year. I had a misspelling in my website and Duke wouldn't sign a contract with me because of that small mistake. Your smear on swift is very serious and in certain cases could result in legal actions.
Comparing yourself to war books you've read that include 1,500 year old killing-people strategies and saying you will manipulate those strategies into real life applications sounds dangerous for anyone's livelihood that crosses your path. This could be construed as insinuating death threats. I voted "blid is gay", but after reading your posts versus the defensive arguments of swift and such, I am more inclined to say "no". You have a dangerous ego and an even more frightening response mechanism to protect that ego.
With that being said, if you can keep your shit together and keep your conversations game related and pacify your emotions, you should be allowed to play. This game has a small player base. Many bots, some hackers and a small real user-base. Banning anyone without replacing that person with a new player should be a no no!
Poll