Author Topic: has antihack caught anyone?  (Read 43190 times)

Offline Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart)

  • "The Architect"
  • Global Moderator
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
    • View Profile
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #15 on: September 06, 2015, 10:03:05 PM »
Nobody with a clue would ever be caught because they wouldn't hack with the antihack enabled.
    

Offline shesycompany

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 3587
  • retired, be in music section
    • View Profile
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #16 on: September 07, 2015, 12:28:58 AM »
instead of banning people could they just have hacker icon for awhile unless they continue to.

Offline EviL~Ryu

  • (ง︡'-'︠)ง "Bitchin!" ®©℗™
  • Dragon
  • **********
  • Posts: 6059
  • "It's going to be Legen-(wait for it......)-DARY!"
    • View Profile
    • Clan EviL Official Page
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #17 on: September 07, 2015, 01:15:01 AM »

instead of banning people could they just have hacker icon for awhile unless they continue to.

Ah like the Scarlet letter, very creative [emoji3]


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

-Administrator of Clan EviL
-Developer (Trivia Development and Analytics)

Offline I hate naggers

  • Ogre Mage
  • ********
  • Posts: 2345
    • View Profile
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #18 on: September 07, 2015, 02:52:32 AM »
instead of banning people could they just have hacker icon for awhile unless they continue to.
no, because there is no "1 account per user" policy on .ru

Offline RipE[Eur0]

  • Berserker
  • *****
  • Posts: 715
  • LAWL! LICK MY RIPESTICKZ0R H0M0 :D
    • View Profile
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #19 on: September 07, 2015, 07:22:47 AM »
why cant u make this antihack program ingame that everyone has to have it. couldnt log in without it , eh?

isnt that the wisest way to handle this? hell yes. why have it ppl can decide whether they use it or not....


Offline Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart)

  • "The Architect"
  • Global Moderator
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
    • View Profile
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #20 on: September 07, 2015, 08:17:23 AM »
This is somewhat early in the process of the full roll out.
    

Offline Certified MENSA Genius Brain (smart)

  • "The Architect"
  • Global Moderator
  • Dragon
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
    • View Profile
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #21 on: September 07, 2015, 08:18:30 AM »
instead of banning people could they just have hacker icon for awhile unless they continue to.
Why would we want to allow people to hack?
    

Offline {Lance}

  • Sappers
  • ******
  • Posts: 889
    • View Profile
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #22 on: September 07, 2015, 10:34:25 AM »
Mostly because those being caught dont have any clue that it's monitored.  It doesnt make much sense to ban them.  But they would certainly notice a new hacker icon on their account.  As for claw saying no its not possible,  he only says that because he's been trying to get that put in place for to long.  But it makes no sense at all as a policy so it will never happen.  It's TOTALLY possible to tag all of a player's accounts with an icon and he knows that.  Why he'd say something as stupid as it's not possible, well,  thats obvious.  He's just whining that smurfs are still allowed.
Dk At hall is cause I started with temple at start and didn't need the castle . Not a hack .  I wouldn't bother editing a ss btw

^---- Dellam doesnt hack!  See, even by his own admission, no hack!!  LMFAO.

Offline I hate naggers

  • Ogre Mage
  • ********
  • Posts: 2345
    • View Profile
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #23 on: September 07, 2015, 11:02:43 AM »
no, actually im all for smurfing, i just thought "1 acc per user" would make sense to get rid of dellams. With hardware ban introduces, 1 acc per player makes no sense

Offline EviL~Ryu

  • (ง︡'-'︠)ง "Bitchin!" ®©℗™
  • Dragon
  • **********
  • Posts: 6059
  • "It's going to be Legen-(wait for it......)-DARY!"
    • View Profile
    • Clan EviL Official Page
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #24 on: September 07, 2015, 01:27:28 PM »

no, actually im all for smurfing, i just thought "1 acc per user" would make sense to get rid of dellams. With hardware ban introduces, 1 acc per player makes no sense

Well I think the hardware ban will solve all of the Dellam problems.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

-Administrator of Clan EviL
-Developer (Trivia Development and Analytics)

Offline Delete mine too

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 2652
  • http://meatspin.com
    • View Profile
    • http://meatspin.com
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #25 on: September 07, 2015, 03:39:19 PM »

no, actually im all for smurfing, i just thought "1 acc per user" would make sense to get rid of dellams. With hardware ban introduces, 1 acc per player makes no sense

Well I think the hardware ban will solve all of the Dellam problems.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Nope lol

Offline EviL~Ryu

  • (ง︡'-'︠)ง "Bitchin!" ®©℗™
  • Dragon
  • **********
  • Posts: 6059
  • "It's going to be Legen-(wait for it......)-DARY!"
    • View Profile
    • Clan EviL Official Page
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #26 on: September 07, 2015, 03:39:56 PM »


no, actually im all for smurfing, i just thought "1 acc per user" would make sense to get rid of dellams. With hardware ban introduces, 1 acc per player makes no sense

Well I think the hardware ban will solve all of the Dellam problems.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk
Nope lol

How so "nope"?


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

-Administrator of Clan EviL
-Developer (Trivia Development and Analytics)

Offline Delete mine too

  • Death Knight
  • *********
  • Posts: 2652
  • http://meatspin.com
    • View Profile
    • http://meatspin.com
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #27 on: September 07, 2015, 03:41:58 PM »
To easy to bypass I'm not gonna say here. Unless those account are strick and not so easy to obtain hwid, ip, banning is a joke unless it done right.

Offline EviL~Ryu

  • (ง︡'-'︠)ง "Bitchin!" ®©℗™
  • Dragon
  • **********
  • Posts: 6059
  • "It's going to be Legen-(wait for it......)-DARY!"
    • View Profile
    • Clan EviL Official Page
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #28 on: September 07, 2015, 03:42:31 PM »

To easy to bypass I'm not gonna say here. Unless those account are strick and not so easy to obtain hwid, ip, banning is a joke unless it done right.

Pfft, ok PM me your reasoning then.


Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

-Administrator of Clan EviL
-Developer (Trivia Development and Analytics)

Offline {Lance}

  • Sappers
  • ******
  • Posts: 889
    • View Profile
Re: has antihack caught anyone?
« Reply #29 on: September 07, 2015, 03:58:47 PM »
I've got ALL the bases covered.  I've thought of everything that could possibly be used to get around it including vm's, virtual nics,  everything.  Theres simply only 1 way around it.  Get your ass out of the house and find a cafe to sit at with a new machine :)  If dellam does that,  then he'll be cruising the country side with car loads of new laptops as we ban all the cafes lol.
Dk At hall is cause I started with temple at start and didn't need the castle . Not a hack .  I wouldn't bother editing a ss btw

^---- Dellam doesnt hack!  See, even by his own admission, no hack!!  LMFAO.