wrong.
1. owners aren't workers,
2. workers don't need owners, owners need workers. workers need the means of production.
So you don't think ownership (of a business or any operation that requires maintenance) requires any kind of work, whatsoever? I don't know guy, I own art supplies and technical pens, and I have to work to prepare the paper, to clean and maintain my pens, to gild the art, to frame, to design the necessary certificates and so on. The issue I have is that, in my business (yes, I have my own business which I own) I do not have certain skills I need, such as web design and coding, and social media maintenance, so I am looking to hire workers. The thing is, without the work I have already put into all of this, I would not have a job to offer a web-designer, coder and social media manager. I couldn't be bothered to do any of that, I am not interested. I don't understand how it is that I own a business but somehow I don't have to work to maintain it. Much less how you apply that to a massive company. I am only one person running a small art operation, but then you have factory owners business owners that have to hire qualified people to maintain aspects they can't. And they have to work to maintain the whole thing running smoothly. If the owner doesn't maintain his business, he will lose it quickly and maintenance require work.
And what if a persons is in need of a job and someone just happens to own a company that needs workers?
You really don't see the mutual relationship?