He also only said "white ss". I havent seen the proof anywhere that Viruz in fact was white. It was just assumed.
it was 2v1, so only one opponent, it's not at all unreasonable to assume a player isn't asking his ally for ss
I agree with blid, a ss showing who specifically is being asked for ss is needed or the request has to be thrown out. many incomplete ss requests that didn't include /ping or show clearly who is being asked have been rejected in the past, the fact that this one involves a person who made a successful ss request doesn't necessarily indicate any bias.
Lethal~Viruz seems upstanding &
probably doesn't hack but no one but him can know that 100%. the ss rule is nice because it allows legit players to easily demonstrate innocence with 1 second of effort. Even if someone is only requesting to be inconvenient they're only causing you 1 second of inconvenience. (that doesn't mean a troll can't have a legit suspicion though.) there's just no good reason to not take ss. the whole system depends on enforcing the right of anyone to request from anyone else at any time even if it seems harsh. at the same time, the request has to be unambiguous & verifiable from an external standpoint to prevent abuse.
It's also notable that Joe's very calm, rational post expressing his personal opinion is called "disrespectful" simply because he dares question the W2 community authority actions or lack thereof, when nothing malicious or deroggatory was said.
the responses to his post were also delivered in a calm & rational way I think, I believe the people who gave them have a right to their opinion too! There's no conspiracy here bs. no one is afraid of yamon & kyle, lol