Author Topic: POLL: Should iL reinstate tk[as]'s admin? (Read 52719 times)

iL · « **Reply #75 on:** October 30, 2015, 08:59:10 AM »

Well, that is not about my personal relation to tk[as].
The reason is tk can be dangerous for forum content.
Admin/moderator can remove/change more data than ordinary user, mod's job is to do it carefully, in coordination with others.

I don't want to be nervous every moment what else tk can destroy. So no, i don't think we should reinstate tk[as]'s admin.

iL · « **Reply #76 on:** October 30, 2015, 09:44:56 AM »

Another question is what you, tk[as] want from your admin role?
You never cared of forum content structure, you never cared about to ban someone on the server, so what?

/ann is not an admin privilege, that is not related to "tk[as]'s admin".
Deleting all ipbans sould also be discussed by other admin, it's not one person decision.
Paying money, talking to people, hosting tounaments are not tasks require admin role.

EviL~Ryu · « **Reply #77 on:** October 30, 2015, 09:57:33 AM »

Quote from: iL on October 30, 2015, 09:44:56 AM

Another question is what you, tk[as] want from your admin role?

You never cared of forum content structure....

Well actually he did.

He did edit a few of my posts to cut down the "flame" when me and Ganz put on a show for you guys a few months ago.

So he did care about forum content and did try to reform it.

Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

~ToRa~ · « **Reply #78 on:** October 30, 2015, 11:37:02 AM »

Quote from: iL on October 30, 2015, 09:44:56 AM

/ann is not an admin privilege, that is not related to "tk[as]'s admin".
Deleting all ipbans sould also be discussed by other admin, it's not one person decision.
Paying money, talking to people, hosting tounaments are not tasks require admin role.

Yeah I do kinda agree with IL.
Besides banning people what exactly should an admin be doing?
TK did say earlier that people want someone who is active and who they can bring their concerns to on the server itself.

If that's the case then the admin position on the server should be mostly symbolic.
I suppose I would take it if the rest of the community is really craving that type of symbolism.
Though truthfully the only other command that I am interested in is the Icon command.
Myself and Smeagol give away Icons for these tournaments as well. So it would be useful not having to email Blid every time
and waiting for it to get done.

tk[as] · « **Reply #79 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:15:17 PM »

Icons. Changing stats. Banning users if 100% necessary. Changing or re-setting passwords (I've had to do that more than a couple times) and yeah being a visible figure users can come to with any questions or concerns including things like hosting or little issues that come up all the time.. just like with vizzer the other day. He came to me Cus he thought I was admin and didn't see any online, since then I haven't seen any admins online. Its safe to say his issue still might not be resolved if he didn't think I was admin.

tk[as] · « **Reply #80 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:23:07 PM »

Bottom line is the community is healthier if there is someone there to assist them with whatever issues they might be having. I did that when I was admin on an almost daily basis and was happy to do it which is why I think I have so much support here from the users. They saw what I did and how I handled the admin position. If u don't think the things I'm talking about are necessary then don't give back.. that's fine. I'm just saying I see a need to fill a position I was in a while back and I'm ready to fill it if u guys think its important to be filled..

tk[as] · « **Reply #81 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:26:37 PM »

Or give it to someone else who understands its a chore sometimes.. someone who isn't gonna slack off just because t becomes an inconvenience like most admins have done in the past. Its babysitting to an extent. There is no doubt about it

tk[as] · « **Reply #82 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:29:40 PM »

It sucks when we get an admin that gets comfortable after a couple weeks and gets this "I'm admin, I can help who I want when I decide to help" attitude.

Swift · « **Reply #83 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:35:47 PM »

All I ask is that if you get admin you don't out my smurfs anymore.

Also, once you get admin I want a money icon... just a stack of $100's

tk[as] · « **Reply #84 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:40:59 PM »

I gave ur aka one time to myst when I was drinking. I apologize.

If I get it (I don't think I will) I will make sure you get an icon of a Benjamin if someone designs it nfp

~ToRa~ · « **Reply #85 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:42:13 PM »

Well it seems IL isn't going to give it to you....So I suppose its probably going to have to be myself or smeag...

Swift · « **Reply #86 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:42:47 PM »

And of the Master icon issue?

Maybe we should talk about this in private. I could potentially fund your campaign if you accommodate me in a few ways upon your election

tk[as] · « **Reply #87 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:45:32 PM »

Man tora why don't u just ask for it. Whether or not I get it has nothing to do with whether u get it or not. I dunno why u keep implying the two are connected. U want it? Ask for it instead of "well I suppose if he's not... I guess I will"

EviL~Ryu · « **Reply #88 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:47:01 PM »

IL is still butt hurt about TK revealing LB's smurf(s) to the public. I which commend TK on such a transparent act, closet Admining is just a disappointment. He thinks it was a "betrayal" of trust, pfft idk how he justifies Admin smurfing.

Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X using Tapatalk

tk[as] · « **Reply #89 on:** October 30, 2015, 12:47:33 PM »

One second ur saying we don't need admin (in regards to me) next ur saying ull do it if I don't.. igdi man

Warcraft II Forum

News:

Poll

POLL: Should iL reinstate tk[as]'s admin?