Don't forget to join Channel: Trivia for trivia!
Heh, we went from 3 to 2, by changing II to 2 in the title nice. Will be interesting to see how warcraft 2 download changes after google updates the cache for the site, we are currently at #3.
Someone with a wikipedia account, make a section about war2.ru on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warcraft_II:_Tides_of_Darkness and give us a link. That is the number 1 hit for warcraft 2.
Quote from: GaNzTheLegend on April 27, 2015, 06:28:28 PMHeh, we went from 3 to 2, by changing II to 2 in the title nice. Will be interesting to see how warcraft 2 download changes after google updates the cache for the site, we are currently at #3.Hah! That's so sweet. Quote from: GaNzTheLegend on April 27, 2015, 06:51:12 PMSomeone with a wikipedia account, make a section about war2.ru on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warcraft_II:_Tides_of_Darkness and give us a link. That is the number 1 hit for warcraft 2.Can do that, but Wikipedia's gonna be tough to beat.
I really don't see that happening though, and I wouldn't want or expect Axo to axe his entire site for our benefit. Yeah we could mirror it, but still.. I dunno, maybe I'm just being sentimental.
He already was willing to do that with the forum, and nobody really visits that site anymore.
his involvement in WC2 these days is nil.
Quote from: GaNzTheLegend on April 27, 2015, 06:51:12 PMSomeone with a wikipedia account, make a section about war2.ru on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warcraft_II:_Tides_of_Darkness and give us a link. That is the number 1 hit for warcraft 2.Since ur "war2's #1 player" i nominate you for this great honor.Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
Quote from: EviL~Ryu on April 28, 2015, 02:03:25 PMQuote from: GaNzTheLegend on April 27, 2015, 06:51:12 PMSomeone with a wikipedia account, make a section about war2.ru on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warcraft_II:_Tides_of_Darkness and give us a link. That is the number 1 hit for warcraft 2.Since ur "war2's #1 player" i nominate you for this great honor.Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000XLinks from Wikipedia are rel="nofollow" and doesnt affect the rank
no follow still effects rank, not as much as do follow of course but still and it gets you some extra hits as well.
Quoteno follow still effects rank, not as much as do follow of course but still and it gets you some extra hits as well.Nothing to fight about but Matt Cutts says: "In Google, nofollow links don’t pass PageRank and don’t pass anchortext"
Links from Wikipedia are rel="nofollow" and doesnt affect the rank
Quote from: Grosshandlaren on April 30, 2015, 01:20:23 AMLinks from Wikipedia are rel="nofollow" and doesnt affect the rankI'd say even a link with "nofollow" could be useful for people who read wikipedia and follow the links from there.Another problem we got several years ago with russian part and russian wiki:Russians tried to add the link to war2.ru, but wiki's moderators removed that link quickly. No idea how to add that link to wiki to keep it permanently.
it has to not look like spam, like "download free warcraft 2" it will get deleted.