Warcraft II Forum
General => General Discussion => Topic started by: SmurfKinG on March 10, 2015, 12:44:43 AM
-
http://www.the-open-mind.com/mit-estimates-half-of-all-children-autistic-in-10-years-due-to-monsanto/ (http://www.the-open-mind.com/mit-estimates-half-of-all-children-autistic-in-10-years-due-to-monsanto/)
-
I have autism.
-
Seems like vaccines are doing their job.
-
Vaccines saved people from polio
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
-
Seems like vaccines are doing their job.
this article isn't about vaccines
-
Seems like vaccines are doing their job.
this article isn't about vaccines
This thread is tho
-
Seems like vaccines are doing their job.
this article isn't about vaccines
There's a sizeable anti-vaccination (or at least anti-mandatory vaccination) movement that believes vaccines directly cause autism. I'm not well read on the subject, but the research (http://www.autismsciencefoundation.org/autismandvaccines.html) seems to solidly disprove the hypothesis. Plus, people's refusal to be vaccinated has been responsible for outbreaks of preventable and diseases on multiple occasions. (Here's some information on that in an easy-to-digest format: http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse (http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse))
Montsanto causing autism though, now that I'll buy.
-
Seems like vaccines are doing their job.
this article isn't about vaccines
There's a sizeable anti-vaccination (or at least anti-mandatory vaccination) movement that believes vaccines directly cause autism. I'm not well read on the subject, but the research ([url]http://www.autismsciencefoundation.org/autismandvaccines.html[/url]) seems to solidly disprove the hypothesis. Plus, people's refusal to be vaccinated has been responsible for outbreaks of preventable and diseases on multiple occasions. (Here's some information on that in an easy-to-digest format: [url]http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse[/url] ([url]http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse[/url]))
Montsanto causing autism though, now that I'll buy.
Then how come the rate of autism in amish is 1 in 10,000?
(http://www.drjeffhealthcenter.com/ihpages/ihimages/mmr.jpg)
-
once again not sure if retard or troll. i know smurf king is solid retard but still unsure about ganz
-
Seems like vaccines are doing their job.
this article isn't about vaccines
There's a sizeable anti-vaccination (or at least anti-mandatory vaccination) movement that believes vaccines directly cause autism. I'm not well read on the subject, but the research ([url]http://www.autismsciencefoundation.org/autismandvaccines.html[/url]) seems to solidly disprove the hypothesis. Plus, people's refusal to be vaccinated has been responsible for outbreaks of preventable and diseases on multiple occasions. (Here's some information on that in an easy-to-digest format: [url]http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse[/url] ([url]http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse[/url]))
Montsanto causing autism though, now that I'll buy.
Then how come the rate of autism in amish is 1 in 10,000?
([url]http://www.drjeffhealthcenter.com/ihpages/ihimages/mmr.jpg[/url])
I already answered this once before when I said "probably because they just lock their autists up in a barn and move on." What I mean by that is obviously lower reporting of autism. But on top of that, say Amish ppl really don't get autism, this is still retard thinking because "vaccines" is just one explanation. It could be, as the article in this thread describes and as you are ignoring, because of pesticides. It could be because they don't play video games or have iPads. It could be any number of reasons. There are a lot of differences in lifestyle between the Amish and mainstream society.
Also you posted that idiot chart before and it's really funny because clearly the British diagnoses follow the exact same pattern as the American ones, even though the British introduce the MMR vaccine years later.
-
I have autism, all.
-
I have autism, all.
Aw. U want a cookie [emoji514]? [emoji317]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
-
I have autism, all.
Don't worry soon more people will be autistic than not, thanks to vaccines.
-
vaccines didn't create autism, jews did.
-
Online jon
Grunt
***
Posts: 161
View Profile
Personal Message (Online)
Re: MIT: 1 for every 2 children to be autistic by 2025 in the USA
« Reply #13 on: Today at 02:36:17 PM »
Quote (selected)
vaccines didn't cr
the jews created the vaccines that caused the autism.
-
Seems like vaccines are doing their job.
this article isn't about vaccines
There's a sizeable anti-vaccination (or at least anti-mandatory vaccination) movement that believes vaccines directly cause autism. I'm not well read on the subject, but the research ([url]http://www.autismsciencefoundation.org/autismandvaccines.html[/url]) seems to solidly disprove the hypothesis. Plus, people's refusal to be vaccinated has been responsible for outbreaks of preventable and diseases on multiple occasions. (Here's some information on that in an easy-to-digest format: [url]http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse[/url] ([url]http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse[/url]))
Montsanto causing autism though, now that I'll buy.
Then how come the rate of autism in amish is 1 in 10,000?
([url]http://www.drjeffhealthcenter.com/ihpages/ihimages/mmr.jpg[/url])
I already answered this once before when I said "probably because they just lock their autists up in a barn and move on." What I mean by that is obviously lower reporting of autism. But on top of that, say Amish ppl really don't get autism, this is still retard thinking because "vaccines" is just one explanation. It could be, as the article in this thread describes and as you are ignoring, because of pesticides. It could be because they don't play video games or have iPads. It could be any number of reasons. There are a lot of differences in lifestyle between the Amish and mainstream society.
Also you posted that idiot chart before and it's really funny because clearly the British diagnoses follow the exact same pattern as the American ones, even though the British introduce the MMR vaccine years later.
Yea except that the british one was introduced 10 years after and spike in britian ALSO happens 10 years after? How come the spikes didn't happen at the same time huh?
-
Also fuck monsanto and their GMO shit ruining the planet and making everyone sick. Well anyone stupid enough to eat it that is.
-
no. i'm not in supportive of the anti-vaccination movement, as it's blatantly false.
although it's intriguing to a huge misanthrope like myself to perpetuate this retard myth as i gleefully jackoff as ancient disease makes a return ravaging through the population.
-
Seems like vaccines are doing their job.
this article isn't about vaccines
There's a sizeable anti-vaccination (or at least anti-mandatory vaccination) movement that believes vaccines directly cause autism. I'm not well read on the subject, but the research ([url]http://www.autismsciencefoundation.org/autismandvaccines.html[/url]) seems to solidly disprove the hypothesis. Plus, people's refusal to be vaccinated has been responsible for outbreaks of preventable and diseases on multiple occasions. (Here's some information on that in an easy-to-digest format: [url]http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse[/url] ([url]http://thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=measles_mouse[/url]))
Montsanto causing autism though, now that I'll buy.
Then how come the rate of autism in amish is 1 in 10,000?
([url]http://www.drjeffhealthcenter.com/ihpages/ihimages/mmr.jpg[/url])
I already answered this once before when I said "probably because they just lock their autists up in a barn and move on." What I mean by that is obviously lower reporting of autism. But on top of that, say Amish ppl really don't get autism, this is still retard thinking because "vaccines" is just one explanation. It could be, as the article in this thread describes and as you are ignoring, because of pesticides. It could be because they don't play video games or have iPads. It could be any number of reasons. There are a lot of differences in lifestyle between the Amish and mainstream society.
Also you posted that idiot chart before and it's really funny because clearly the British diagnoses follow the exact same pattern as the American ones, even though the British introduce the MMR vaccine years later.
Yea except that the british one was introduced 10 years after and spike in britian ALSO happens 10 years after? How come the spikes didn't happen at the same time huh?
They did.
-
I have autism, all.
Don't worry soon more people will be autistic than not, thanks to vaccines.
That's true now, but it's not because of vaccines, it's because of video games.
-
Also fuck monsanto and their GMO shit ruining the planet and making everyone sick. Well anyone stupid enough to eat it that is.
there's nothing actually wrong with genetically modified foods, it basically creates better quality food.
monsanto however does act very immorally, they're pretty much human garbage, but that's every large corporation. this is a problem with capitalism.
-
the jews created the vaccines that caused the autism.
Damn it. I try to take conspiracy theorists seriously and fully hear them out, but they always end up busting out shit like this.
-
the jews created the vaccines that caused the autism.
Damn it. I try to take conspiracy theorists seriously and fully hear them out, but they always end up busting out shit like this.
this thread was a good read. guess general discussion can be entertaining.
-
Also fuck monsanto and their GMO shit ruining the planet and making everyone sick. Well anyone stupid enough to eat it that is.
there's nothing actually wrong with genetically modified foods, it basically creates better quality food.
monsanto however does act very immorally, they're pretty much human garbage, but that's every large corporation. this is a problem with capitalism.
Thats why gmos are banned pretty much all over the world except north america where people are too stupid to do the research about them.
-
the jews created the vaccines that caused the autism.
Damn it. I try to take conspiracy theorists seriously and fully hear them out, but they always end up busting out shit like this.
Its true tho, They want to reduce the world population by 90% thru vaccines, gmos, chemtrails, fluoride, and manmade bioweapons.
-
I have autism, all.
Don't worry soon more people will be autistic than not, thanks to vaccines.
That's true now, but it's not because of vaccines, it's because of video games.
Uh no lots of kids don't even play video games that much and if you look at the charts, the autism rates started exploding long before video games were mainstream.
-
Damn it. I try to take conspiracy theorists seriously and fully hear them out, but they always end up busting out shit like this.
All conspiracy theories go back to the Jews whether the conspiracy theorist realizes it or not.
Uh no lots of kids don't even play video games that much and if you look at the charts, the autism rates started exploding long before video games were mainstream.
It's video games, idiot.
-
Highly illogical.
-
Its highly logical for this to highly illogical
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
-
your research consists of listening to alex jones.
everything we eat is genetically modified. unless you live in the wild and eat animals and plants.. many apples are a hybrid of some sort, it makes our food better.
-
your research consists of listening to alex jones.
everything we eat is genetically modified. unless you live in the wild and eat animals and plants.. many apples are a hybrid of some sort, it makes our food better.
lol, there is a huge difference between hybrid foods and gmo foods. Hybrids are totally fine.
-
your research consists of listening to alex jones.
everything we eat is genetically modified. unless you live in the wild and eat animals and plants.. many apples are a hybrid of some sort, it makes our food better.
lol, there is a huge difference between hybrid foods and gmo foods. Hybrids are totally fine.
that's what genetic modification is.
-
it's when scientists started doing it in a lab that people started crying about it, probably after having a good glass of milk too for an extra juicy bit of irony.
-
Im on cellphone, battery dying. I have a few contributions to the thread but no time, just had to reply to this
Jon, ur a fucking retard
Lol
-
lol if you think genetically modified food exists because its better for people and not because its more profitable for agribusiness
-
Mmm, aren't these perfect apples engineered by capitalist science delicious? Keep eating and buying them, mmmm!!! Good little goy!!!
-
rofl even the annoying hassan kid is more aware than this hermit retard hahaha
jon thinks because the good almighty usa government approved countrys food, its safe and its actually better
that usa gov whos deputy comissioner from FDA is former monsanto lawyer, and continues to approve your newly lab GMO food.
okay.
Have fun.
just don't procreate.
no use.
lmao
-
Bananas are extinct now. Nice going, Jon.
-
your research consists of listening to alex jones.
everything we eat is genetically modified. unless you live in the wild and eat animals and plants.. many apples are a hybrid of some sort, it makes our food better.
lol, there is a huge difference between hybrid foods and gmo foods. Hybrids are totally fine.
that's what genetic modification is.
u really cant be that stoopid, educate yourself
http://www.motherearthnews.com/real-food/hybrid-seeds-vs-gmos-zb0z1301zsor.aspx (http://www.motherearthnews.com/real-food/hybrid-seeds-vs-gmos-zb0z1301zsor.aspx)
-
The squirrel experiment http://foodrevolution.org/blog/squirrels/ (http://foodrevolution.org/blog/squirrels/)
Paul Fonder was curious to see what kind of corn squirrels would favor.
Last fall, Fonder conducted an experiment in his South Dakota backyard. He built a squirrel feeder and put genetically modified corn fresh from a neighbor’s field on one post and one-year-old organic corn on the other.
“You would expect squirrels to prefer fresh corn over corn that’s a year old,” said Fonder. But that’s not what happened.
Here’s a simple picture that tells the story.
([url]http://244z4035563zsv8dq301c242m4.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Corn-experiment.png[/url])
Corn-experiment
Fonder repeated the experiment five times, using different varieties of organic and GM corn. Each time, he got the same results.
Do you think that it’s possible the squirrels might be on to something here?
If you want to see GMOs labeled in the United States, like they are in the picture, then here’s some good news. Labeling efforts are underway in 26 states, and in November voters in the state of Washington will have the opportunity to make their state the first in the nation to mandate labeling without condition.
Public interest lawyer and Food Revolution Summit speaker Michele Simon has written a new post with an update on important developments in Washington’s Initiative 522, and how you can help.
-
Bananas are extinct now. Nice going, Jon.
NOT The BANANAS!![emoji33]
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
-
lol if you think genetically modified food exists because its better for people and not because its more profitable for agribusiness
it's profitable to have apples less susceptible to diseases by selective breeding, so probably both reasons.
-
They dont give a shit if squirrels wont eat it as long as they can grow/harvest/sell more. Right? May not be good.,..
-
Mass production at its finest.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
-
As well as bigger profits, more yields and less pesticide use has resulted from genetically modified crops. There's nothing new about it either, only more efficient ways of modification.
-
A capitalist will be motivated by anything that increases profit. If the pesticide use is possibly causing autism they won't care, and if a higher yield leads to greater sales they don't care if nutrition or compatibility with human digestive systems is ideal or equal, as long as it sells
-
Well yea health doesn't mean much in the way of profit under capitalism, the tabacco industry is a pretty extreme example.
-
Yep. So theres no reason to assume gmo food = good... Im sure it could be good for humanity in many cases, but i wouldnt be willing to accept a blanket assumption that it's goode.
-
I was just trying to counter the nonsense by ganz, gmo's have many pros and cons. It's not all bad.
-
its either good or bad
there no mid-terms
you cant talk bout cons or pros here, its not a fucking new tech gadget you're buyin
its what you feed from
and monsantos roundup is pretty bad.
-
it can be good sometimes. say they modify something so that it's resistant to some sort of fungus, with no ill effects. that's good
say they modify something so that now it loses nutritional value or w/e, that's not good
-
jon here's something for you to j/o to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_natural_disasters_by_death_toll#Ten_deadliest_natural_disasters_since_1900 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_natural_disasters_by_death_toll#Ten_deadliest_natural_disasters_since_1900)
-
yeah
thats the issue here
who determines something has no ill effects?
FDA?
Michael Taylor.
ex-former-monsanto lawyer.
good one.
8)
-
last months or years theres been gmo labeling campaign, (to inform consumers wether a product has or hasn´t GMOs)
dont remember if its only in some of the us states or countrywide,
most big companies have been spending millions of dollars opposing labeling.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/money/agriculture/2014/11/01/companies-spend-big-beat-gmo-labeling/18289505/ (http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/money/agriculture/2014/11/01/companies-spend-big-beat-gmo-labeling/18289505/)
nothing to hide nothing to fear huh?
Among the largest contributors is DuPont Pioneer, a seed producer based in Johnston that has contributed $4.5 million to the anti-labeling efforts in Oregon and another $3 million in Colorado. Monsanto, DowAgroSciences, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo also have been major donors to opposition efforts.
(http://www.inspirationgreen.com/assets/images/Issues/Food%20misc/gmo%20labeling.jpg)
the above picture isn't updated. i know hersheys just turned against all GMO, they no longer even be feeding cows with gmo crops.
-
yeah
thats the issue here
who determines something has no ill effects?
FDA?
Michael Taylor.
ex-former-monsanto lawyer.
good one.
8)
well right we dont have a strong independent regulatory authority, but that doesnt mean, by default, that all GMO food stuffs is definitely bad
-
the only reliable authority is mother nature.
ever.
if the squirrel don't eat it
i don't eat it.
8)
-
You really aren't understanding what GMOs actually are smurfking. We've been doing this since ancient history with selective breeding of horses for example, which is the oldest form of genetic modification. Today with vastly superior technology and DNA sequencing we're doing it in labs. Americans have been eating GMO foods now for over 20 years since the Flavr Savr tomato hit the market in 1994 and not a single incident has been reported since that would suggest they are harmful to our health.
-
Video games and GMO foods (Doritos) gave me autism and gender dysphoria.
-
If gameing is impacting your life in these ways, maybe you can increase your capacity to withstand your gameing habits with Game Fuel. Let me know how it goes, and good luck.
-
You really aren't understanding what GMOs actually are smurfking. We've been doing this since ancient history with selective breeding of horses for example, which is the oldest form of genetic modification. Today with vastly superior technology and DNA sequencing we're doing it in labs. Americans have been eating GMO foods now for over 20 years since the Flavr Savr tomato hit the market in 1994 and not a single incident has been reported since that would suggest they are harmful to our health.
no its you who isnt understanding shit
and obviously did not read the link i replied to you already
http://www.motherearthnews.com/real-food/hybrid-seeds-vs-gmos-zb0z1301zsor.aspx (http://www.motherearthnews.com/real-food/hybrid-seeds-vs-gmos-zb0z1301zsor.aspx)
im well aware of breeding,
you can't compare a guy wanting to make a new dog breed, by mixing lots of breed and get a doberman cuz thats how it was achieved.
and compare it to breed a phosphorescent sheep
theres a huge difference between hybrid seeds and gmo seeds.
there are many pros in hybrids plants, and are totally fine.
(higher yield, hell there's even a plant that yields tomatos and potatoes in same plant, in the UK. and was done with minimal equipment,
not high tech gmo crap)
the gmo (specifically monsanto) are meant to withstand chemicals and proven toxic materials (roundup) for human consumption. or any animal .
-
The writer of your article is afraid of "unnatural" processes. If it doesn't happen in nature "naturally" it's a scary thing. Well, ebola exists naturally in the jungles of Africa where its reservoir the bat (most likely) could shit the virus into a kids mouth and start an epidemic that can kill thousands. Anthrax is a bacterium that exists naturally in the wild that can spread from animals to people, it's incredibly lethal .The bacteria can live up to 70 years after an infected animal is long dead and buried.
It's only when actions that may be considered unnatural by some, likely the writer of your article, that a vaccine helped eliminate anthrax infection.
The highly toxic "Destroying Angel" mushroom grows naturally in the wild.
Using natural to mean good and unnatural to mean anything bad is just highly illogical and a plain wrong way to look at things.
GM crops are also not suppose to "withstand chemicals". They're made to be resistant to disease and pests so less chemicals are necessary.
-
yes
mixing bacteria dna to plants, or animal to plants and/or viceversa is not natural
just like the article said, it would never happen naturally.
anyway, thats not the only issue
the CONS list is huge, (goggle BEES and GMO)
but im not a greenpeace activist or anything, so not feel like debating this any further,
ill just state if thats not enough issue for you , well, theres no point in arguing any further, u want to believe, eat whatever the hell u want
ill just say, research further. the gmo is getting to ur brain already lol
p.s. ebola. lol. ebola doesn't exist. ebola is a scam.
-
Pesticides are killing the bees. GMO crops which lead to less need for these toxic chemicals could help the bees.
p.s. ebola. lol. ebola doesn't exist. ebola is a scam.
:o
-
If gameing is impacting your life in these ways, maybe you can increase your capacity to withstand your gameing habits with Game Fuel. Let me know how it goes, and good luck.
Hell, I'd be lying if I said I'd have it any other way.
-
Pesticides are killing the bees. GMO crops which lead to less need for these toxic chemicals could help the bees.
p.s. ebola. lol. ebola doesn't exist. ebola is a scam.
:o
GMO crops are killing the bees, They have pesticides built into them, what do you think happens to the bees when they eat the pollen?
-
Pesticides are killing the bees. GMO crops which lead to less need for these toxic chemicals could help the bees.
p.s. ebola. lol. ebola doesn't exist. ebola is a scam.
:o
GMO crops are killing the bees, They have pesticides built into them, what do you think happens to the bees when they eat the pollen?
(http://replygif.net/i/1408.gif)
-
Pesticides are killing the bees. GMO crops which lead to less need for these toxic chemicals could help the bees.
p.s. ebola. lol. ebola doesn't exist. ebola is a scam.
:o
GMO crops are killing the bees, They have pesticides built into them, what do you think happens to the bees when they eat the pollen?
No.
-
. GMO crops which lead to less need for these toxic chemicals could help the bees.
wrong again
http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethhoffman/2013/07/02/gmo-crops-mean-more-herbicide-not-less/ (http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethhoffman/2013/07/02/gmo-crops-mean-more-herbicide-not-less/)
One of the main arguments behind creating these engineered crops is that farmers then need to use less herbicide and pesticide. This makes farms more eco-friendly, say proponents of genetically modified (GM) crops, and GM seeds also allow farmers to spend less on “inputs” (chemicals), thereby making a greater profit.
But a new study released by Food & Water Watch yesterday finds the goal of reduced chemical use has not panned out as planned. In fact, according to the USDA and EPA data used in the report, the quick adoption of genetically engineered crops by farmers has increased herbicide use over the past 9 years in the U.S. The report follows on the heels of another such study by Washington State University research professor Charles Benbrook just last year.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETrB6z3VMak (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETrB6z3VMak)
-
. GMO crops which lead to less need for these toxic chemicals could help the bees.
wrong again
[url]http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethhoffman/2013/07/02/gmo-crops-mean-more-herbicide-not-less/[/url] ([url]http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethhoffman/2013/07/02/gmo-crops-mean-more-herbicide-not-less/[/url])
One of the main arguments behind creating these engineered crops is that farmers then need to use less herbicide and pesticide. This makes farms more eco-friendly, say proponents of genetically modified (GM) crops, and GM seeds also allow farmers to spend less on “inputs” (chemicals), thereby making a greater profit.
But a new study released by Food & Water Watch yesterday finds the goal of reduced chemical use has not panned out as planned. In fact, according to the USDA and EPA data used in the report, the quick adoption of genetically engineered crops by farmers has increased herbicide use over the past 9 years in the U.S. The report follows on the heels of another such study by Washington State University research professor Charles Benbrook just last year.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629 (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629)
According to actual scientists pesticide use has been reduced by 37%.
-
. GMO crops which lead to less need for these toxic chemicals could help the bees.
wrong again
[url]http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethhoffman/2013/07/02/gmo-crops-mean-more-herbicide-not-less/[/url] ([url]http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethhoffman/2013/07/02/gmo-crops-mean-more-herbicide-not-less/[/url])
One of the main arguments behind creating these engineered crops is that farmers then need to use less herbicide and pesticide. This makes farms more eco-friendly, say proponents of genetically modified (GM) crops, and GM seeds also allow farmers to spend less on “inputs” (chemicals), thereby making a greater profit.
But a new study released by Food & Water Watch yesterday finds the goal of reduced chemical use has not panned out as planned. In fact, according to the USDA and EPA data used in the report, the quick adoption of genetically engineered crops by farmers has increased herbicide use over the past 9 years in the U.S. The report follows on the heels of another such study by Washington State University research professor Charles Benbrook just last year.
[url]http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629[/url] ([url]http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629[/url])
According to actual scientists pesticide use has been reduced by 37%.
and who funded the study? oh of course monsanto, syngenta, or dupont. Follow the money. If its an independent study, it will get more credit but 99% of the studies are funded by the big agricultural companies. The vaccine companies had 2 studies a couple years ago that said mercury is actually good for children's brains. LOLOLOL the most neurotoxic substance on the planet..
-
Lol indeed.
-
. GMO crops which lead to less need for these toxic chemicals could help the bees.
wrong again
[url]http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethhoffman/2013/07/02/gmo-crops-mean-more-herbicide-not-less/[/url] ([url]http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethhoffman/2013/07/02/gmo-crops-mean-more-herbicide-not-less/[/url])
One of the main arguments behind creating these engineered crops is that farmers then need to use less herbicide and pesticide. This makes farms more eco-friendly, say proponents of genetically modified (GM) crops, and GM seeds also allow farmers to spend less on “inputs” (chemicals), thereby making a greater profit.
But a new study released by Food & Water Watch yesterday finds the goal of reduced chemical use has not panned out as planned. In fact, according to the USDA and EPA data used in the report, the quick adoption of genetically engineered crops by farmers has increased herbicide use over the past 9 years in the U.S. The report follows on the heels of another such study by Washington State University research professor Charles Benbrook just last year.
[url]http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629[/url] ([url]http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0111629[/url])
According to actual scientists pesticide use has been reduced by 37%.
and who funded the study? oh of course monsanto, syngenta, or dupont. Follow the money. If its an independent study, it will get more credit but 99% of the studies are funded by the big agricultural companies. The vaccine companies had 2 studies a couple years ago that said mercury is actually good for children's brains. LOLOLOL the most neurotoxic substance on the planet..
Both authors are affiliated with the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development at Georg-August-University of Goettingen (Goettingen, Germany). No competing interests were reported. Emidio Albertini was the editor of the publication and is affiliated with the University of Perugia (in Italy). Funding sources came from the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the European Union's Seventh Framework Progamme (part of FOODSECURE).
Neither authors appear to have received any funding by biotech companies in recent papers (same with their respective university).
Wilhelm Klumper worked for the German Farmers' Union for two months in 2008; worked for an agricultural development program for another two months in 2008; and worked in agricultural research for a few months in 2010. He previously worked at UC Davis for two semesters (Fall 2009, Spring 2010).
Matin Qaim is a member on the Editorial Board of the Journal "Food Policy" (since 2007); he is a member of the Golden Rice Humanitarian Board; he was the Chair of the External Advisory Board of the Africa Biofortified Sorghum (2006-2009) ; and is a Member of the Board of Directors of Africa Harvest Biotech International Foundation (since 2008).
Both of these individuals also hold other titles and are well qualified in their respective field (just take a glance at their CVs!). To be clear: neither individual has directly worked for a biotechnology company. Both have been involved in projects utilizing genetically modified organisms throughout their careers (largely a function of, and funding by, EU studies and humanitarian work abroad).
University profiles of both the researchers:
[url]http://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/73908.html[/url] ([url]http://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/73908.html[/url])[1] [url]http://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/325493.html[/url] ([url]http://www.uni-goettingen.de/en/325493.html[/url])[2]
this was posted in the comments on reddit where I found the source.
-
think Ganz might not be troll and might be full retard
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB4p-5Fhd30 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CB4p-5Fhd30)
-
Drink SMART Water, it cures all.
Sent from my Motorola DynaTAC 8000X
-
(http://i62.tinypic.com/14dog07.jpg)
-
Monsanto Admits to Having An Entire Shill Department to Fight Anto-GMO Research
http://investmentwatchblog.com/monsanto-admits-to-having-an-entire-shill-department-to-fight-anto-gmo-research/ (http://investmentwatchblog.com/monsanto-admits-to-having-an-entire-shill-department-to-fight-anto-gmo-research/)